I believe a key factor in hiring the right person for the job is to have the proper mix of interviewers to be able to assess an applicant from different perspectives . Just recently, our department (technology service provider for Student Affairs) went through a hiring process for a database developer. We were looking to fill a position to provide support for our developers in setting up and managing databases. In my role as the head of the unit consisting of developers, I was assessing the applicant from the customers’ perspective. Joining me in the interview committee were other co-workers who were more technical in nature (server admin, database manager). To be consistent with all applicants, we have a set of questions we ask each candidates. These questions consist of technical and behavioral questions.
After one of the first interview sessions, I wasn’t fully satisfied with the applicant in terms of his attitude towards working with other developers who he will be providing service for. I felt like I did not get enough information about how he would approach certain situations, specifically how we would react when there’s a conflict between he and a developer. As I reviewed the set of questions, I noticed that there were only about 3 behavioral questions within the approximately 15-20 questions we asked, as all the other questions were technical (e.g. database optimization, security, database design models). I offered the suggestion that we should add more behavioral questions to get a better understanding of how the applicants in terms of his customer service attitude. Interestingly, one of my co-workers who is member of the interview committee (server admin) said this “Anyone with half a brain can fake an answer to a behavioral question”, essentially dismissing the value of behavioral questions. I disagreed of course. At the same time, I realized that he was assessing the applicant from a perspective he was comfortable with and feels essential for the job. In a sense we were both right in that the applicant had to have the technical competence but also the customer-service driven attitude, although we were both emphasizing one over the other.
From personal experience, I have worked with very technically competent co-workers but not-so-good customer service attitude. Unfortunately, working with these individuals have proven to be very difficult and in some cases demoralizing. Given a choice, while technical competence has to be considered, I would rather take someone who has the right attitude. In my opinion, technical skills are easier to teach, bad attitude is harder to fix.
December 1st, 2010 on 11:03 am
Joe,
Another great post! Usually you can teach technical skill development. But that’s not so easy when it comes to attitude. Attitudes are not skills — they’re personal traits or characteristics. An attitude is not so easy to turn on or off. I think we pay far too little attention to the importance of attitude in a service organization. Thank you for this contribution.
Tim Flood
Stanford University
December 1st, 2010 on 12:48 pm
Thanks Tim! In past interviews, I was asked this question – “Would you have issues working with folks that are more technical superior than you?” My answer was, “if I was the most technically knowledgeable person in our organization, then we’ll be in trouble.” My point is that as a manager, I definitely love surrounding myself with folks who are smarter than I am. What I didn’t say at that interview was that it’s not so much that I have issues with more technically talented folks working with me, it’s the “i’m special” attitude that I have trouble with. Oftentimes, technically savvy employees are excused in their behaviors because their skills are valuable.
However, at the end of the day, I still want a team-oriented and customer-service driven person working with me.