Random Thoughts on the Yik Yak at NASPA 15 Controversy

As I read the reactions on twitter and blog posts by student affairs folks on the comments made on Yik Yak, random thoughts/questions came to mind. This post by Paul Gordon Brown provides a good collection of the reactions from this incident. A session was held at the conference to talk about the incident and here are the tweets from the session. They may be wrong/right from your perspective, but here are just some random thoughts that came to mind.

  • How much of the strong reactions against the Yik Yak posts are based on the need for validation/proof of credibility of the student affairs profession? From time to time, I read the frustration of how those outside student affairs don’t seem to understand what we do and that’s why we need to do a better job telling our stories. For some, is it about protecting the reputation of the student affairs profession?
  • When students make mistakes, some folks talk about these mistakes as teachable/learning moments and opportunities for growth. I think there’s a sense that students are still developing as people. What if we apply the same mindset to professionals? It’s not like we all become perfect individuals once we became professionals or when we get the letters after our names. No one is perfect and the development process lasts a lifetime, me included.
  • Even before this Yik Yak controversy, I’ve heard of the topics of “hooking up” at conferences and participants using conferences as paid vacations. It’s not as if Yik Yak introduced these issues, but it just made them more public and when I mean public, the whole internet to see.
  • With the topic of “hooking up”, I’ve also seen moral judgments on another person’s sexual activities (“slut shaming”) before Yik Yak and I think there’s a sense that it’s happening here as well.
  • Even professionals need to understand how to be good digital citizens -by understanding the pitfalls and opportunities provided by social media and how their participation (positive/negative) impact themselves as well as their communities.
  • Not all comments were negative.
  • I can’t believe anyone would actually even post some of the comments I read. SMH.
  • How many of those comments came from student affairs in attendance at the conference? Is there a chance that there are individuals who posted comments to further exploit the situation for fun or for malicious intent?
  • I refrained from providing my reaction on twitter as I wasn’t quite sure how it will be taken. I didn’t feel safe offering my opinions. Sometimes, twitter isn’t always the best place to have productive conversations even in a community that promotes itself as being open to conflicting ideas.

I’m also reminded of a conversation I had with a student on one benefit of Yik Yak. I asked this student her opinion on social media and how students view and use social media. We came to the topic of Yik Yak. Her response was that Yik Yak, because of the anonymity it provides, is a good venue for students to express their opinions in an honest way. She talked about the topic of masturbation and how students shared their opinions without feeling judged.

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>